Moot court memorial pdf download

Before you go, let us offer you a flat INR discount coupon for your next course purchase. Home Blog: Mooting Basics. Share on facebook Facebook. Share on twitter Twitter. Share on linkedin LinkedIn. Share on whatsapp WhatsApp. Share on email Email. Share on print Print. Share on facebook. Share on twitter. Share on linkedin. Share on whatsapp. Share on email. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google.

Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Amol Shetty. A short summary of this paper. PG NO. PG NO 5 Statement of issues……………………………………………………. Criminal Appl. Appeal w. Write petition Rev. Revision Mrs. Mister Vs. Versus Up Uttar Pradesh Gov.

Others Pg. Page Uoi Union of India Anr. Another Mrs. Misses Ccr. Current criminal report Ed. Edition i. Law journal Re. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, 8 SCC Subramanian Swamy v.

Raju S. Crl No. Gupta v. COM 2. COM 3. COM 4. COM 5. COM 6. Ramachandran, Law of Writs 6th ed. Datar, Commentary on Constitution of India 2nd ed. Vol I H. Seervai , Constitutional Law of India 4th ed. COM 2. COM 3. COM 4. COM 5. COM 6. Ajit Solanki aged 35 years riding the motor cycle no- GUI While riding the motor cycle on the road a tractor baring number GJK driven Shanker Singh collide with the motor cycle exactly at the middle of the road.

Because of the rash and negligent driving of the driver of tractor,the accident took a tragic turn. In the collision, the front wheel of the motor cycle was separated from the body of the motor cycle. In the collision with such a big vehicle coming at a faster speed, appellant lost his control and fell down along with his kids and they all sustained injuries.

All three of them were taken to the nearest hospital at Halol. After medical examination, it was concluded that the minors had multiple fractures on their body. The appellant and his children were taken to Civil Hospital, Sola where they had to undergo surgeries. It was opined by Dr. A first information report was lodged in Halol Police Station against the driver under sections , and of the IPC, The appellant filed the claim petition before the Motor September 18, Accidents Tribunal, Ahmedabad.

He claimed the compensation for disability of himself and his children and stated his current income to be Rs 21,00, per annum of which he was earning Rs 6 Lacs from Carpenter business and 15 lacs from agriculture. He also produced Income Tax returns filed for year 08, and showing his income to be Rs 12 Lacs, Rs 15 Lacs and Rs. The tribunal has wrongly considered it to be a contributory negligence without any cogent evidence.

The pillion riders where the children of appellant and it is reasonable that a man having motorcycle will take his children in same vehicle in which he is travelling there is no FIR filed against the appellant. The insurance company has given facts which are not at all relevant to the following case as it states that accident might occur due to wheels coming out but in the present case the accident has occurred the wheels came out due to the accident between tractor and motor bike and not because wheels coming out 3 Whether the tribunal has awarded just and fair compensation?

The claim tribunal has wrongly calculated the multiplier and also not considered the future prospects of the appellant and his children who suffered multiple injuries.

Accident by bus. The bus driver is solely responsible for the accident. Jagannath Rai v. Gangarathana C. Bus and tampto as vehicles — accident on the central line tampo came in the center in an attempt to cross the motor cycle. Chandrappa v. In National Insurance Co. Akhilesh Dwivedi 4 A truck while overtaking a bus came to its wrong side and collided with a motorcycle.

Truck driver was alone held rash and negligent in driving.